|
Wednesday, 6 April, 2005
|
|
|
Lost @ histories end
I was talking with someone last week-end, a young women who does
child care at our church Sunday mornings. She had the Sunday Washington
Post with her, and a reaction to the headlines I suppose many have had.
"Three weeks of Teri Schiavo dying slowly amid nonstop media stories,
now a week of the pope lying in state on every station and every
page." I don't mind the coverage on Pope John Paul, I believe the
coverage really is a celebration of his life - more than just a
ritualistic exercise. The conversation led on in that direction - her
asking why I thought Pope John Paul was a great man, his role in
keeping the Polish Church together under the deep shadow of the Soviet
regime, lending a portion of his authority to Lech Walensa's Solidarity
movement. She surprised me here: "Surely", she said, "Russia and
Eastern Europe were far better off under Soviet rule, safe from
capitalism. If the pope had a hand taking that away from them; then he
inflicted a great calamity on them. Crime, Russian mob millionares
corrosivley running and robbing the society. Prostitution rings
selling women into slavery [catalogued this week : Human Traffic and Transnational Crime: Eurasian and American Perspectives].
Eastern europe is a mess everyone knows it." She said she had visited
Russia and this is what the people there had told her. They especially
didn't like Mikhail Gorbechov. "Before him Russia had order, respect,
things were all right." Nostalgia is a perverse fiction that can make
people believe a great many sad and unhelpful things, such beliefs warm
and cheer the hearts of authortarians and police states everywhere.
"Didn't I think that communism was a just ethical system - the
highest form of government ever developed", she asked. I mumbled
something about the tendency of marxist governments to impoverish their
people. A tendency to become - intolerent of internal dissent.
"Cuba", She continued, "now there is a happy nation where
everything is fine and they all love Fidel Castro." I'm sure some
do, particularly the ones who can also remember Battista. Cuba is a
poor nation I pointed out.
"What of it", she said, "what can 'poor' mean if everyone is poor
together and shares their lot equally." This is a fine and romatic
notion, but Cuba is probably poorer than it ought to be; given its
natural and human resources. Plus Cuba may not be all that egalitarian.
Communist states arrange themselves into privileged elites, and
unprivileged masses with an envied efficiency. Still even the World
Bank's own statistics place Cuba's economy in the lower middle-income
bracket, where one finds Egypt, Turkey, Brazil, the Philippines, even
the Russian Federation itself World Bank Group - Data and Statistics, and they've maintained that with very little recourse to globalization.
I felt lost utterly lost. Lost like a driver on a cross Sahara
dunebuggy race who's just noticed his GPS gadget doesn't work. I had
been trying to think of things to say about Paul Wolfowitz taking over
at the World Bank (better than his being at the Penatgon, or not
significantly different). Thinking about the sincerity and direction of
his committment to alleviating poverty. Speculating on the World Bank's
endeavor to turn worlds wealth over to bankers and the financial
service industry; whose primary product appears to be the creation of
debt in countries and individuals. Contrasting this with the sincerity
of his committment to U S control of the worlds remaining oil
production. With Jafari and Talabani in as PM and President of
Iraq New Iraqi PM named - Guardian,
Zalmay Khalilzad named as ambassador, it seems his work there is done.
Ironic, needing to pause and beat the concept of old school
command economies back into its box and mail it back to the 20th
century, while the 'free' trade/'free' market privatized economy being
constructed in Iraq will be the one of most commanded and least open to
discussion economies, ever set forth in this world.
11:53:42 PM ;;
|
|
|
|
- Prolegemma to any future FAQ.
- Who are you again?
- paul bushmiller
- what is it exactly that you do?
- at the least, this.
- What is this?
- it's a weblog.
- How long have you been doing it?
- 3 or 4 years. I used to run it by hand; Radio Userland is more convenient.
- Ever been overseas?
- yes
- Know any foreign languages?
- no
- Favorite song?
- victoria - the kinks
- RockandRoll? Favorite American song then
- Omaha - Moby Grape
- Favorite Movie
Billy in the Lowlands
- favorite book?
- any book I can read in a clean well lighted place
- Is this one of those websites with lots of contentious, dogmatic and brittle opinions?
- no
- What do you expect to accomplish with this?
- something
|