Atomized junior

Dedicated to the smallest particles of meaning on the web
Atomized Links:



theUsual Suspects:




Terrifying face of the Other
(a bloglist)


Radio Radio
WMUC 88.1fm College Park, MD.
Streams:
high, low


WZBC 90.3 FM Newton,MA.
Stream
WFMU-FM
91.1 Jersey City, NJ; 90.1 Hudson Valley, NY
32k stream (low),
128k Stereo stream (high)


Subscribe to "Atomized junior" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Wednesday, June 7, 2006
 
Net Neutrality

Net neutrality is a notion not dissimilar to common carrier Common carrier - Wikipedia the idea that a limited public resource that conveys people, materials, or information must do so equally and without discrimination. Carry one carry all. I feel like I'm flogging the dead horse of history, besides try getting that one past a lawyer. If you laid the pages of existing telecommunications law edge to edge, well I'm sure that would break some law of nature. Net Neutrality is coming before congress for disposition: Net neutrality goes up for a vote in Congress. I got an email from George Washington University's Internet Project for Democracy and the Internet (IPDI) announcing they were presenting a happening June 16th on this: IPDI presents "Net Neutrality. What's at Stake - for the Internet, Politics and Consumers" (Mike McCurry is speaking). Lawrence Lessig and Robert McChesney have select words in a OpEd ed up in the Washington Post on this No Tolls on The Internet.

I've seen the ad campaign leveraged by the cable companies. That much forced cute has got to be expensive So what's at stake? The ability to discover and pursue revenue streams at will. Similar to the way some web (log) tools, where the end user content (euc) lives on the internet service company's server, are about to decide that your web log/space needs to host their ads. (EUC... how do you suppose thats pronounced, yuck perhaps?). The ability to control the speed of service by creating content tiers. The ability to control content by controlling the surfing experience. They can make your content ugly (uglier than you've already made it) They can render it inefficient by privileging other content. They can decide what lives, what dies, and what pays on the web. We already have radio, Tv, cable that are owned things and work according to their familar gatekeeping way. The internet has shown already it does not need the captured attention of the telecom's and cable companies to be viable and useful. When they say it does they are speaking only of their own self interest not yours.


11:52:52 PM    comment [];trackback [];


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
2006 Paul Bushmiller.
Last update: 6/9/06; 8:45:35 PM.
June 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
May   Jul


Prolegemma to any future FAQ.

Who are you again?
paul bushmiller
what is it exactly that you do?
at the least, this.
What is this?
it's a weblog.
How long have you been doing it?
3 or 4 years. I used to run it by hand; Radio Userland is more convenient.
Ever been overseas?
yes
Know any foreign languages?
no
Favorite song?
victoria - the kinks
RockandRoll? Favorite American song then
Omaha - Moby Grape
Favorite Movie
Billy in the Lowlands
favorite book?
any book I can read in a clean well lighted place
Is this one of those websites with lots of contentious, dogmatic and brittle opinions?
no
What do you expect to accomplish with this?
something

Site Meter