Atomized junior

Dedicated to the smallest particles of meaning on the web
Atomized Links:



theUsual Suspects:




Terrifying face of the Other
(a bloglist)
Radio Radio
WMUC 88.1fm College Park, MD.
Streams:
high, low
WZBC 90.3 FM Newton,MA.
Stream
WFMU-FM
91.1 Jersey City, NJ; 90.1 Hudson Valley, NY
32k stream (low),
128k Stereo stream (high)


Subscribe to "Atomized junior" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Wednesday, December 7, 2005
 
Place of Origin

I am sensitive to how well the war in Iraq plays out. How it will impact on American influence and prestige. On America's moral authority. Not that that rests on Iraq entirely or even the middle east. I hear the criticism - of the criticisms. I take them seriously, even as I don't take their messengers seriously. We went into Iraq on a bizzare enterprise of dubious provence. We broke the Iraq that existed unveiled a model of a new Iraq and forced people to take sides. That places an obligation on us. Some take that obligation as justifying the whole. That if the current objective is right then criticizing any part of it is wrong, that it weakens the effort. A line the administration and its supporters suggest: that the fortunes of this state impeded allows the use of anything to contain any perceived threat. That no further legitimacy is needed than this need and the power to compel it by force. Also that however and wherever our soldiers stand. Standing behind them, supporting them, requires we acquiesce to, even explicity sign on to the policies of current administration.

I feel a pang of conscience for how the Vietnam war ended. It did not end well. I remember thinking that at the time. I should not like to see South Vietnams fate replicated in Iraq. I don't want us to hold on through another U S election cycle then back out leaving the government in Iraq to be cut to shreds by baathist's and theocrats. This sense has been sharpened by knowing my friend Tran, my smart and lovely friend Tran, these last few years. She remembers the end of the war too, her family was ordered out of their home in Saigon back to to her fathers town of origin. She grew up in a system that never stopped telling her that families like hers were bad people possibly in need of comprehensive "re-education". She of course was a wee tiny little thing back then.

  I am very aware that in her view of things republicans are the defenders of freedom, undercut by the weak willed democrats, who would then be its enemies. This is an oversimplification. But you can't help how you feel. I believe one of the first things she did as an American citizen is join the republican party.

Tran's Vietnam is the original Vietnam, the decisions of those days still live in some lives. I see the example of her life cutting across this debate both ways. On one hand Vietnam exists as a stark example of a shameful broken trust. On the other the quality of living in Vietnam after armed re-unification, should be a retort to rallying in on a simplistic patriotism: "My country right or wrong." "[Country x] love it or leave it, ingrate." Calls for automatic and uncritical support for the designs of the few or even of the many (I know of no "peoples" government which actually consist of the many, but either way...) beacuse anything less than a guarded unaniminity is a threat, ought to be brushed off and ignored.

The fall of South Vietnam left the Catholic and American associated populace locked out of the prevailing culture. Patriotism belonged to the Viet minh. Nothing to the rest. Tran could not rationalize her countries behavior. Equate it with right exercise of power. Could not justify its ways and allotment of privilege. Could not accord it legitimacy. She became unreconcilably alienated from it. The part of her family that stayed, learned that when the government knows your have relatives in the west you cannot get work. They essentially force the family to remit the livehood of those remaining. A few weeks ago she was part of a group that stood downtown in a cold November rain to protest a group from Vietnam that was in the U S raising money for Vietnamese victims of Katrina. They had no use for Hanoi's hypocritic grandstanding - no common cause - and were inclined to say so. They wanted the delegation out of the country.

Leaving her homeland can be read as an explicit admission that home, home being land plus a people and how they live on it, is not the ultimate depositary of truth and feeling. The emigrants of this world for better or worse in the slender baggage of their motavation, show by getting up and walking away from a place, their place, a desire for greater justice than coercion and mere order. Greater autonomy than obedience.


11:41:44 PM    comment [];trackback [];


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
2005 Paul Bushmiller.
Last update: 12/9/05; 4:33:43 PM.
December 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Nov   Jan


Prolegemma to any future FAQ.

Who are you again?
paul bushmiller
what is it exactly that you do?
at the least, this.
What is this?
it's a weblog.
How long have you been doing it?
3 or 4 years. I used to run it by hand; Radio Userland is more convenient.
Ever been overseas?
yes
Know any foreign languages?
no
Favorite song?
victoria - the kinks
RockandRoll? Favorite American song then
Omaha - Moby Grape
Favorite Movie
Billy in the Lowlands
favorite book?
any book I can read in a clean well lighted place
Is this one of those websites with lots of contentious, dogmatic and brittle opinions?
no
What do you expect to accomplish with this?
something

Site Meter