|
Friday, 29 August, 2003
|
|
|
NYT's wind-power technical
I have no deliberate intention to keep posting stories about windpower; it just works out that way. A stray quixotic tendency I imagine. This story from the NYT is the missing manual to the posts I put up last week and in June. A run-down of the technical state of the art. Wind Turbines are getting much more efficient, they are also getting much larger. I thought I had seen an article like this in Science News but I couldn't find it last week. ._._. pb _._
Wind Power's New Current. A high-tech update makes windmills more efficient, changing the energy equation. But inconspicuous they're not. By Scott Kirsner. [New York Times: Technology]
10:15:47 AM ;;
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2003
Paul Bushmiller.
Last update:
9/05/03; 10:41:29.
|
|
August 2003 |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul Sep |
- Prolegemma to any future FAQ.
- Who are you again?
- paul bushmiller
- what is it exactly that you do?
- at the least, this.
- What is this?
- it's a weblog.
- How long have you been doing it?
- 3 or 4 years. I used to run it by hand; Radio Userland is more convenient.
- Ever been overseas?
- yes
- Know any foreign languages?
- no
- Favorite song?
- victoria - the kinks
- favorite book?
- any book I can read in a clean well lighted place
- Is this one of those websites with lots of contentious, dogmatic and brittle opinions?
- no
- What do you expect to accomplish with this?
- something
|