Week 11: Group A Moves

Implicating Morality and History in Rhetoric

By now you have a sense for the active creative force of text in creating the socio-cultural world in which humans live. Discourse serves a practical role in the knitting of our day-to-day activities. Once rhetoric is seen as a force for textual merger, then a number of questions open seeking to understand traditional concepts and their relationship to this process. Two of those that have been a focus of rhetorical theorists are morality and history.

In addressing the practical reasoning problem, theorists had discovered that one of the most important advantages of rhetorical logic was its more powerful account of morality in human action. The initial development here was the concept of an advisory rhetoric: as individuals we use rhetoric to provide moral advice to others. But then, with the growth of the constitutive rhetoric, attention turned to rhetorically constituting morality. The rhetorical construction of morality became a central problem just as the rhetorical construction of reality was a problem for the social epistemics.

Similarly, history could be seen not as a study of material events told in language, but as a construction brought textually into rhetorically constituting the moment. But on what terms?

Clusters: Rhetoric as advisory; Rhetoric and history; Rhetoric and morality

Questions to stimulate thought:

Before Class Preparation:

Take some time to peruse this website: http://september11.archive.org/

As, and after, your perusal, consider the following questions:

Basic Readings:

Additional Reading:

Recent Work: Selected by Sheri Parmelee and Elizabeth Gardner


The Critical Rhetoric Move

This move is probably the "end" of contemporary theory, because it reduces the very idea of theory to criticism. It builds this possibility on the place of rhetoric within social action.

This movement begins in the neo-Marxist tradition called critical theory. Habermas writes in this tradition. Critical theory attacks concepts of "theory" that are abstract rather than concrete (the critique it gets from Marxism). It is, therefore, a theory which forces praxis. But Marxism is a modern theory. Does postmodernism call for something more? That has given rise to concepts of critical rhetoric where theory is set aside.

Clusters: Critical theory; Critical rhetoric, Cultural criticism.

Questions to stimulate thought:

Basic Readings:

Additional Reading:

Recent Work: Selected by Jim Gilmore and Tim Barney

Return to the COMM 652 Home Page