Policy decisions -- local, state, or federal -- may dramatically affect the lives of families. Yet, policy proposals often focus on individuals such as unwed parents, youth offenders, or school dropouts, and fail to consider them as part of families.
According to Shirley Zimmerman, family policy is a "certain perspective for thinking, understanding, and acting regarding families." From the family resiliency perspective, all families have strengths. Empowerment becomes the chief cornerstone of policies that enhance resiliency.
The essential first step in developing family-friendly policies is to ask the right questions. G. L. Stevens suggests some questions as guides: What values have influenced the development of the policy? Does the proposal benefit one group of families at the expense of others? What will be the short- and long-term impact on families and communities? Does the policy enhance or deter family stability?
T. Ooms and S,. Preister outlined six guiding principles for evaluating policy impact on families. Each principle reflects an implied value.
Underlying Value: Families fill some functions best; substitutes are a last resort.
Underlying Value: Removal of family members is justified only as protection from serious harm.
Underlying Value: Solutions to individual problems shouldn't harm other family members.
Underlying Value: Policies usually are more relevant to family needs when families are involved in their development.
Underlying Value: All families need support and shouldn't be disadvantaged because of structure, cultural values, life stage, or circumstance.
Underlying Value: All families deserve support. Policies should give special consideration to those with the greatest social and economic limitations, and to those most likely to break down.
Empowering families to think critically about the public policy issues that impact them and encouraging dialogue between families and policy makers are major steps in building resiliency individuals, families, and communities.